logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.14 2014고단1839
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is against D and E fraud and fraud using computers, etc.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the Chinese telephone financial fraud assistance staff operated by F, G, and sexually impaired H, I, etc., planned to acquire money by means of a so-called “singing” method that allows many and unspecified domestic unspecified persons to deposit money with a name-to-facebook by posting a telephone, and the telephone financial fraud assistance staff to transfer money from China to a designated account by posting a telephone from the domestic victim to the designated account, and the Defendant conspired to perform the role of remitting the amount of damage money withdrawn from the large passbook to the Chinese side by ordering F, J, and G.

On July 4, 2012, a member of the telephone financial fraud assistance in the name-free statement made a false statement to the effect that he/she would make a phone call to a victim's name-free person, and that he/she would arrange to go on the part of the victim's name. The member was transferred 70,000 won to a non-deposit account as compensation for the remaining conditions from the victim, and the F was returned to G by finding the passbook at the high-speed bus terminal freight service office located in the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, and the above G withdrawns the above amount from the passbook to the above passbook and deposited it into the account in the name of K at the Dong branch of one bank from July 15, 2012.

In addition, the Defendant and F, J, G, and the telephone financial fraud assistance staff from the name-free telephone account have been transferred to the sum of KRW 486,50,000 as shown in the attached Table 1 from around February 19, 2013 and all deposited into the K or L bank account over 44 occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims in collusion with F, G, J, and telephone financial fraud assistance staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness F and J;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statements made by F, J, and M among copies of each protocol of examination of suspect by prosecution against F, J, and M;

1. Prosecutions on F.

arrow