Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, “2014 Highest 4720”, along with the Chinese telephone financial fraud assistance staff operated by C, D, and sexually unfair E, F, etc., conspired to acquire money by means of the so-called “Sishing” method, which allows many and unspecified domestic people to deposit money by means of a short term bank account in Korea by posting a phone, and to transfer money from China to a designated account by calling a phone from China, and the Defendant conspired to take charge of transferring the amount of money that was withdrawn from the large bank account with D upon C’s instruction to transfer money to the Chinese side.
On July 4, 2012, an employee of the telephone financial fraud assistance in the name-free statement made a false statement to the effect that he/she would make a phone call to the victim's name unsured person in China, and to the effect that he/she will arrange to go on the part of the victim's name. It was transferred from the victim to an unsured account in return for the payment for the remainder of the conditions. The Defendant and D, together with the Defendant and D, found the passbook at the high-speed bus terminal cargo handling office located in the Nowon-gu in Busan Simpo-gu, Busan, thereby withdrawing the money obtained by the telephone financial fraud organization as above from the passbook, and deposited it into the account in the name of G at the Dong branch office of one bank in the name of G around July 15, 2012.
In addition, the Defendant and C, D, and the members of the telephone financial fraud assistance staff have withdrawn totaling KRW 29,750,000 from around September 27, 2012 to around September 2012, all of them deposited into the account in G bank account in the name of G over 11 times.
Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims in collusion with the aforementioned C, D, and telephone financial fraud assistance staff.
The defendant of "2014 Highest 7389" assumes a financial transaction by misrepresenting the post office and investigative agency in collusion with telephone financial fraud assistance staff, H, I, etc. in order.