Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

As a member of the C general market reconstruction project association, the Defendant, as a part of the C general market rebuilding project association, has decided to pay the cost of preserving and managing the building in consultation with the officers of the C general market rebuilding project association in relation to the construction and sale of D main complex building owned by the D general market rebuilding project in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is in charge of the construction and sale of the above building and the trust company for the building in charge of the construction and sale of the above building. On the contrary, the Defendant, as a member of the C general market rebuilding project association, had decided to bear the cost of preserving and managing the above building in consultation with the union's officers. On the contrary, the Defendant, without the qualifications of officers of the above association, had arbitrarily organized the C

1. Around 14:00 on January 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) installed a lock-out lock-out lock-out lock-out device of the total number of eight households, which was unsold in lots owned by the victim C general market rebuilding and improvement project association; (b) replaced the entrance door-up lock-out equipment of the total number of eight households, 603, 605, 801, and 803, and replaced the building with another lock-out lock-out device; and (c) removed the entrance door-up lock-out equipment of the total number of seven households, which is unsold in lots owned by the victim, to prevent the opening of the entrance door of the total of seven households, 106, 116-1, and 123, the Defendant maintained the utility of the entrance-out entrance of each of the above units owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant’s interference with business was prohibited from entering the said unsold apartment units by replacing the locking system in order to prevent the opening of the entrance door of 8 households and 7 households in unsold apartment units, such as the date and place indicated in paragraph (1) at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1). The Defendant obstructed the management and sale of the said apartment units and commercial buildings by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damaged photographs;

1. Criminal facts;