Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around 16:00 on May 11, 2010, the Defendant destroyed the above locking system equivalent to KRW 90,00,00 of the market price of the victim’s possession by removing locking devices installed by the victim at the above entrance and attaching a new locking device under the Defendant’s management, on the following grounds: (a) the victim G Co., Ltd. at “FE” at the “FEt” located under the building D and E; (b) at the auctioned the above FE building; and (c) the entrance was replaced to manage the building; and (d) the entrance was corrected and the entrance was displayed within the mate.

B. The Defendant dismantled the entrance locker at the time, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and intruded into the structure managed by the victim by entering the said set.

C. The Defendant interfered with the management of the above building by a victim, a corporation established for the purpose of real estate rental, etc. by force, such as replacing the entrance locking equipment of the above marina to prevent the victim from entering the victim’s employees at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a

2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. On May 17, 2010, the Defendants jointly obstructed the entrance doors of the said Frant owned by the victim to prevent the victim’s employees from entering the said Frant, thereby damaging KRW 300,000 at the repair cost.

B. The Defendants jointly intruded the above entrance door to the structures managed by the victim, setting up the said mate, in order to prevent the defect in order to replace the locking device by entering Hart, who is an employee of the victim, at the time and place described in paragraph 2(a).

C. The Defendants conspired to and at the time and place set forth in paragraph 2(a), the victim He et al., an employee of the said company G, shall prevent the victim H et al. from entering the said mate in order to replace the locking device as above, and shall be by force, such as opening the entrance door.