The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

According to the records of this case, the court below sentenced the accused case to 14 years of imprisonment, dismissed the claim regarding the case claiming attachment order, and only the accused filed an appeal against the part of the accused case.

On the other hand, Article 9(8) of the Act on the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders provides that "if an appeal or waiver or withdrawal thereof is filed against the judgment on a specific crime case, the judgment on the case claiming the attachment order shall be deemed to have been filed, or the waiver or withdrawal thereof shall be deemed to have been filed against the judgment on the case claiming the attachment order." This applies to the case claiming the attachment order, i.e., the benefit of appeal, i., the benefit of appeal, and the defendant cannot make an unfavorable appeal against himself/herself. Thus, if only the defendant dismissed the request for attachment order, and only the defendant appealed against the case claiming the attachment order, the appeal against the case claiming the attachment order, which

If so, since the part of the request for attachment order is separated and confirmed, it shall be judged only on the part of the defendant's case.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

At the time of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) heard the victim’s words “the same feat feat” from the victim at the time of the instant case; (b) 3 times after the victim’s feat or the victim’s side feat; (c) caused the victim’s death; and (d) subsequently, in order to disguise the victim’s suicide, the Defendant was faced with the victim’s feat in the item of the victim’s feat; and (c) there was no fact that the Defendant murdered the victim using

Nevertheless, the lower court convicting this part of the facts charged is unlawful.

In light of the fact that the Defendant is deeply against the instant crime, etc., the lower court against the Defendant.