logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.09.08 2016노541
업무방해
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 21, 2015, from around 03:14 to 03:27 of the same day, the Defendant expressed to the victim E (the age of 26) who was an employee who francing the scam at the D convenience store located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, that he reported himself to the police before towing the victim, and that “the victim francing, francing, francing, francing, and francing, francing,” and obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as francing a large amount of sound in front of the entrance and avoiding disturbance, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business for approximately 13 minutes.

2. Judgment of the court below

A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

① On January 21, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol on January 21, 2015, found D convenience points in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and purchased drinking water and took drinking water into consideration, and then began to take anti-end and abusive language to employees E, referring to the fine problems arising from criminal cases between E and the Defendant.

After that, the convenience store entrance has been opened and the reflectors and bathing have continued, and the time was 30 seconds for 1 minute.

② The Defendant tried to enter and leave the convenience store, and the Defendant opened and opened the convenience store entrance around 03:17.

그러자 E은 마침 편의점으로 들어오는 위 다른 손님에게 112 신고를 대신 해 줄 것을 부탁한 다음, 피고인을 �아가 편의점을 비워둔 채 경찰이 올 때까지 편의점 앞 노상에서 약 10여 분 동안 피고인을 붙잡고 있었다.

③ In the above process, one customer, outside the above convenience store, takes one of the drinking water at the cooling house of drinking water installed outside the convenience store, and the police has taken the drinking water into the convenience store, and the other customer did not appear.

B. The “defluence” of the relevant legal doctrine on the crime of interference with business is all the forces capable of suppressing and mixing a person’s free will.

arrow