The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The punishment of a fine of one million won imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, although it is found that the defendant complained of economic distress and did not repeat again, it appears that all of these circumstances were considered in the prosecution and the court below. The crime of this case is likely to obstruct the performance of official duties by the defendant who was charged with the cab-free cab, and caused damage to public goods by hindering the defendant from walking a fire in the cab office due to an assault by the police officer, etc. Furthermore, the defendant's responsibility for the crime is considerably heavy, and the defendant's punishment is considerably heavy. In full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not unreasonable to deem it too too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.