A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 22, 2014, around 221:10, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the frontway of the D, who was in the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was dispatched to the scene by F and G, a police officer belonging to the police station E box of the Medical Police Station, upon the resident’s report.

At the same time and place as above, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F (30 years of age), a police officer who tried to kill the Defendant in an emergency rescue vehicle, such as booming and scambling the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the protection of the hosts, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim F, such as cerebral celebs with detailed unknown treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the above time, at a place, and at the above time, damaged public goods used by public offices by breaking up two H patrol vehicles, which are public goods used by the above police officers F and G in the E box called out, by walking up two strings of the H patrol vehicles, which are used by the above police officers F and G while boarding.

3. The Defendant, like the above paragraphs 1 and 2, committed an act of assaulting a police officer on official duty, arrested a flagrant offender committing an offense that damages public goods, and was transferred to the police station E district, but was released for hospital treatment.

Around 01:50 on February 23, 2014, the Defendant, who completed hospital treatment, found the area as above E, which was located in the Guci Government, and left the books in the district as hand, and threatened the police officers I, etc. working in the said district, with the warning that “I, etc., who were employed in the said district, would have been in the name of Scar, I, etc., have been in the rise in the price of arms by taking a lock, and he would be found in the auditor of the hearing and inspection room on the Saturday, and that I, etc., who would be in the position of the police officer.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers such as receipt of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1..