A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:15 on February 2, 2018, the Defendant opened a door on the part of “D” operated by the victim C, which was not corrected, and intruded into the door. The Defendant then invadedd the victim’s property at night over 10,000 won in the market price from October 24, 2017 to February 2, 2018, including 10,000 won in each page, 70,000 won in each page (4,000 won in each page, 10,000 won in each page), 70,000 won in each market price, 1,000 won in each page, E, and 670,000 won in total, and 1,000 won in each page, and 1,000 won in each of the victims’ property and 1,000 won in each of the following:

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property by intrusion upon the victim's structure at night.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of C, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. A report on the occurrence of each incident, a report on the occurrence of an accident, and a arrest report on the occurrence of each incident;

1. Police seizure records and report on each investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of the occurrence of CCTV, the entrance of the CCTV at the scene of the crime, the surface of the moving route, the surface of the moving route prior to the crime, the surface of the suspect raised by the M convenience store, such as a receipt, a receipt, a photograph of the seizure status, the surface of CCTV-cape, such as the scene of the crime, the screen of the CCTV-cape at the scene of the crime, the surface of the scene of the crime, the surface of the location of

1. The prosecutor under Articles 330 and 342 of the Criminal Act with respect to the facts constituting an offense in the indictment, provided that Article 342 of the Criminal Act was omitted in the indictment and Article 342 of the applicable Criminal Act concerning the crime Nos. 7 of the daily list of crimes in the indictment, but it is obvious that such omission was caused by mistake.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The number of offenses committed by the defendant and the amount of damage caused by the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.