Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2016 Highest 325, 2015,” the Defendants, on the ground that D was the representative director in the name of D from November 25, 2013 to January 6, 2015, jointly operated “E”.

The Defendants, upon having experienced difficulties in operating due to sales at the end of May 2014, using documents, such as a certificate of seal impression issued from D to the doping that office operating expenses, etc. are insufficient, a certificate of seal impression issued from D to the company that it is necessary to conduct the business, and an abstract of resident registration card, and a copy of the certificate of resident registration card, have borrowed money from D-owned forest and forest land as collateral.

The contest was recruited.

around June 20, 2014, the Defendants borrowed KRW 20 million from G to the Seoul Northern District Court registry office located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and from G to the business fund. The Defendants did not consent to D to borrow money from G or provide the said forest land as a security for the borrowed money. However, the Defendants prepared documents for filing an application for registration of the establishment of a right to collateral security (right to collateral security) with D’s seal certificates, etc., and submitted them with D’s seal impression certificates, etc. on June 23, 2014. A public official under the name-free circumstance, who is unaware of the aforementioned circumstances, had D make the debtor in the forest as above and registered the establishment of a right to collateral security (right to collateral security) with the maximum amount of KRW 26 million with the claim amount of KRW 26 million with D as

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to the public official to enter false facts in the real estate register, which is the original copy of the fair deed, and exercised it by having the above registry office keep it.

"2016 Highest 402"

1. On April 8, 2014, Defendant A’s forgery of a private document stated “D’s resident number” as “D’s number,” although he/she did not have been authorized by D to obtain a certificate of his/her personal seal impression for the purpose of exercising the certificate within the jurisdiction of the Government of the Government of the Government of the 1st Government of the 1st Government of the Republic of Korea, and signed “D’s certificate of personal seal impression or legal agent’s consent” and signed D’s personal seal impression on the side of D’s name and affixed the certificate of personal seal impression for the purpose of certifying rights and obligations or facts.