A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the husband and wife who reported marriage to F and F on October 20, 2008, and currently is currently in a divorce lawsuit, and is operating the lub oil wholesale and retail business on the eightth floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building with the trade name of “H”.

The Defendant used the single-story housing in Mosung City as a H logistics warehouse. From May 20, 201 to May 20, 2016, the Defendant subscribed to the Insurance Co., Ltd. in Modern Commercialization with the insurance amounting to KRW 250 million, including the maximum compensation amount of KRW 50 million and maximum compensation amount of KRW 200 million for the stored goods.

On May 20, 2016, all parts were revised according to the application for changes in indictment.

On March 2013, when it is anticipated that the above F’s housing in the name of F, which was subscribed to fire insurance around the end of March 2013, the Defendant committed a forgery of the F’s power of attorney and issued F’s seal impression certificate, and used the F’s document as delegated by the F to prepare and submit relevant documents necessary for the claim of insurance money, thereby receiving the fire insurance money from the F.

1. Counterfeiting a proxy or private document of a certificate of seal imprint and uttering of such certificate;

A. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3 Dong Office, the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3 Dong Office, stating that “A”, “A” in the column for delegation, “A” in the column for delegation, “B” in the column for delegation, “B” in the column for delegation, and “F” and “J” in the resident registration number column; and (b) had been kept in advance following F’s name.

F's seal has been stamped.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the F’s “a letter of delegation of certification of seal or written consent of legal representative” in the name of F, a private document to prove facts.

B. The defendant at the time, place, etc. mentioned in the above paragraph (a) is not aware of the name of the Dong office that may not know the forgery, and the defendant has forged the above.