logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.10.30 2019가단272583
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 28, 2019 to October 30, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 22, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) was diagnosed with the pre-permanent cancer at a non-party B hospital; and (b) was transferred to the Central Veterans Hospital located in Jinro 61-gil 53, Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); (c) on January 18, 2019, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital provided an operational treatment for the pre-permanent cancer of the Plaintiff.

B. Meanwhile, on December 11, 2018, as a result of the Plaintiff’s taking of chest radiation by an examination before the surgery, it was confirmed that the single pulmonary ray was on the right side side of the pulmonary ray.

However, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital did not take chest-CT shooting for a close inspection against the plaintiff, or did not provide consultation on blood salves, or respiratory surgery.

C. On January 17, 2019, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant Hospital for an operation, stating that “Around December 12, 2019, the Plaintiff should have a close inspection that there is an rare fluoral disease at the time of the early health examination,” and the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel stated that “I would confirm the outpatient test with respect to a waste inspection.” However, the Defendant Hospital did not take any further examination or measure related to the waste before the operation.

On January 18, 2019, the Plaintiff expressed the opinion that “as a result of the chest radiation shooting conducted after an operation, the Defendant hospital’s image department and the reading of the film shows that “in the absence of any special change from the relocation inspection and the transfer inspection, the confirmation and clinical tracking, observation, or, if necessary, the further inspection.”

E. As a result of the chest radiation taken again on January 19, 2019, the Plaintiff expressed the opinion of the Defendant Hospital’s film board that “the size of the shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot

However, on January 28, 2019, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital did not notify the Plaintiff of the result of the aforementioned examination until the discharge of the Plaintiff, and did not additionally notify the Plaintiff of the results of the examination.

F. The Plaintiff around November 5, 2019, which was about nine months after November 201.

arrow