logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.27 2017고정864
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Daegu District Court on September 10, 2009, and the judgment was finalized on April 15, 2010.

On August 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months in the Daegu District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment was finalized on September 1, 2010.

[2] The Defendant, on March 1, 2009, held that “C, a partner of a multi-household construction project, is a partner of a multi-household construction project” in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2009, is a chapter 1 of a promissory note with a face value of KRW 39 million in the name of D, and the issuer D does not pay for bills.

In addition, it is false that the Republic of Korea has the right to share in F in Busan, and the bill of exchange is discounted to the said bill under the name of G, the representative of F, which is the discount of the bill of exchange. It is used for the construction fund promoted by us at discount. However, the above bill of exchange is borrowed from the person who is the president of H, who is a specialized bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

Nevertheless, on April 6, 2009, the defendant deceiving C and let C know of the circumstances do not know of the fact. The defendant held the victim I a part of the bill of breabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb where "The issuer D was a person dealing with fibers, and the representative G of F was endorsementd on the bill. Therefore, there is no risk of dishonor.

On the 10th of the same month by means of false statement, the said bill was received from the injured party with the account under the name of J as the discount amount of promissory notes, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A complaint, a copy of a promissory note, and a detailed statement of transactions;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow