logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.08 2016가합53715
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 1, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on September 1, 2012 to subcontract the structural construction work for the new establishment of a kindergarten in a zone A with the following content:

(hereinafter “instant construction work” and “instant contract”: The construction period of KRW 1,590,90,000 (including value-added tax): September 1, 2012, the date of commencement of construction: Article 24 (Special Engineer Claim) (1) of the date of completion of construction of September 10, 2012 (Completion of Approval for Use) is known to the effect that the drawing of the interior has not been completed, and that the interior and the dysia may be changed later.

It is a kindergarten licensing condition corporation.

External signboards / Indoor Earthing (Standard for Authorization) / Outside Main and Accessing Areas, and Installation of Indoor Flagings / Indoor Flagings / Electrical Construction with the inner wall 2p finishing condition, which is exempted from the outer machine, are excluded from light equipment costs and personnel expenses (in the case of other electrical construction works, the interior wall construction works are excluded from water supply/dothing materials costs and personnel expenses for the class / class / class / class / class / class of each class, and all other construction works including estimate are included in raw materials (in the case of steel, reflags), and the contract amount of the other construction works shall be adjusted in the amount of the total amount paid after the payment of raw materials by Gap (Defendant).

1) Out fence construction work, 4) outside fences, including the approved drawings and specifications of interior drawings;

B. On January 29, 2013, the approval for use of a kindergarten newly built by the instant construction project was issued.

C. From September 6, 2012 to March 8, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 1,004,000,000 to the Plaintiff out of the instant construction cost.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of evidence Nos. 12 and 17, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The construction cost for the remaining part of the Plaintiff’s construction work and the interior part of the Plaintiff’s construction work is KRW 1,194,00,000 in total, and the Defendant is the Defendant.

arrow