logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.09 2014고단9153
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, for four months, and for four months.

However, the defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 26, 2010, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Incheon District Court on April 22, 2011, which was sentenced four months to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Incheon District Court on April 22, 201, and completed the execution of each sentence in the 3rd North Korean Prison on December 26, 201.

Defendant

C On April 22, 2011, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Incheon District Court, and was paroled on September 30, 201 during the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on September 30, 201 and passed on December 26, 2011.

1. Defendant A

A. When the Defendant came to know that there was a plan to replace the existing signboards and to support the replacement cost within the limit of 50-100% of the cost of producing and installing the signboards according to the business plan formulated by the Gu office to the advertiser who installs the three-dimensional LD signboards in Incheon Middle-dong, Dong, and Yeonsu-gu, from 2012 to 2014, the Defendant directly found the advertiser, while promoting that the advertiser would minimize the individual charges of the advertiser or replace the signboards without the individual charges, and in fact, the advertiser recruited the advertiser by proxy, and then, in fact, did not receive the replacement cost from the advertiser, even though he did not have received the replacement cost from the advertiser, the Defendant issued a tax invoice in advance as if he received the replacement cost from the advertiser, stated the installation cost in the column of the tax invoice, and intended to receive the payment of the subsidy under each Gu office’s business plan by submitting it to each Gu office.

On June 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) produced and installed a signboard with a trade name “H” in the vicinity of Incheon; and (b) applied for the subsidy to the Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, instead of the advertiser.

arrow