A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On June 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and four months in the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 27, 2015.

On November 6, 2012, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s office located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Seoul, stating that “In-house, while serving in the modern steel, retired from office, and related persons were well aware of the fact.” 40 million won, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, and F, that “I will be employed in the modern steel, and I will get the children employed in the modern steel.”

However, in fact, the suspect did not have the intention or ability to find the victims' children in the modern file.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was given KRW 40 million to the victim under the pretext of employment route funds.

"2015 Highest 3040"

1. On May 201, the defrauded told the Defendant to the effect that “The Defendant would leave the same house as that attached to H on the land owned by the Defendant, the total construction cost would be KRW 190 million, and the ownership will be transferred upon completion of construction around the end of October 2011, after starting around June 201, the Defendant came to know of the Victim I through G having set up a house of electric source, and the Defendant came to know of the Victim I before having opened the house of electric source, and the total construction cost would be KRW 190 million.”

However, from 2010 to 2010, the Defendant was in bad credit standing, and even if the Defendant was paid a loan amount equivalent to 430 million won, it was planned to use a portion of the loan without using it for construction cost, and accordingly, there was no intention or ability to keep a house like that it was put to H before the victim as the victim promised to do so. Since the Defendant was planning to set up a collateral security by providing the above G land, which is a site for a house for a electric source, as security for the above loan obligation, and even if the entire house was constructed, there was no intention or ability to transfer the right of ownership to the victim normally.

The defendant.