logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.19 2015가합631 (1)
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 58,525,387 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 20, 201 to August 19, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The pertinent Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Defendant’s D University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant University Hospital”) as satisfying damage and satisfying death, and received surgery from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, such as satisfying and dynafying from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital.

B. On January 19, 201, the Plaintiff’s first head of the Defendant Hospital (the Plaintiff’s first head of the Defendant Hospital) filed an appeal for pain and urology at the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the first head of the instant hospital”) at around 22:10 on the same day, when the Plaintiff’s punishment and fladbed at the house at around 20:0, when she faced with the left mar at a 50cc high level of 50cm.

(2) At around 22:30 of the same day, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by E with a static surgery of the Defendant Hospital, and at around 23:50 of the same day, at around 23:50 of the same day, the F of the urology and the major conducted a re-examination of the urology and conducted an estimate diagnosis, and the diagnosis was conducted with the symptoms of the bathromothosis, the bathosis, and the ba

3) On January 19, 201, when the Plaintiff complained of difficulty in urology, medical doctors G provided urology to the Plaintiff on or around 23:41, and around 04:00 the following day, urology had been conducted again, and thereafter urology had been brought about as a result of urine analysis and analysis conducted by using urine collected twice, and no special circumstances have been found to the Plaintiff. 4) The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital showed that urology had urology from the Plaintiff around 09:10 on January 20, 201, and the doctor F explained about the reasons for discharge to the Plaintiff’s father around 09:55 on the same day, and the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff around 10:10 on the same day (hereinafter “instant discharge”).

C. After the discharge of the Plaintiff’s second Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff complained of her urology and her urbane with her mar and her mar, and on January 21, 201, the Plaintiff complained of her urbium in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the second internal clinic of the instant case”). On January 21, 201, the Plaintiff was born from the Plaintiff’s sexual organ on the Plaintiff’s new wall, and again, around 07:20 on the same day

(2) The doctor F of the Defendant Hospital is the Plaintiff.

arrow