1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or deleted as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

No. 66 of the 5th trial of the first instance court, "No. 66" of the 16th trial of the first instance court, shall be written with "No. 66, 74."

The judgment of the court of first instance (which is the last 5th and second 1st of the judgment of the court of first instance) stated that “an application for adjudication has been filed, but the Seoul High Court may recognize the dismissal of the above application for adjudication on July 18, 2018, respectively.”

The 6th sentence of the first instance judgment was pronounced, and the 9th sentence was followed as follows.

Defendant B appealed as Seoul Central District Court 2018No209 on this issue. However, the said court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on July 18, 2018, and Defendant B appealed as Supreme Court Decision 2018Do12435, which is currently pending in the final appeal, as the Supreme Court Decision 2018Do12435 of the first instance judgment, and used “ July 26, 2017” as “ July 26, 2016,” the part of the first instance judgment, i.e., the 15th through 17th (the Plaintiff did not exist).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.