Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. 재물손괴미수 피고인은 2019. 3. 29. 00:03경 서울 종로구 종로123, 종로3가역 1번 출구 앞 노상에서, 피해자 B(46세)이 C 택시를 잠시 정차한 상태에서 손님을 기다리고 있었는데, 피고인이 “일산역”이라고 말하여, 피해자가 “일산 어디 역이요”라고 되물었더니, 피고인이 갑자기 위 택시 조수석 문짝을 발로 찼으나 손괴되지 않는 바람에 미수에 그쳤다.

2. 모욕 피고인은 위 제1항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서, 피고인이 위와 같이 택시 조수석 문짝을 발로 찼고, 이에 피해자가 피고인을 붙잡고 항의하자, 주변에 택시를 잡고 있던 불특정 남성 3명 등이 있는 자리에서 피해자에게 "이 새끼"라고 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of the police statement concerning B;

1. Statement of maintenance and inspection;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and investigation reports outside the head of a taxi (verification of video recording of a taxi track);

1. Relevant Article 371 of the Criminal Act, Article 376 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum amount of two crimes is aggregated);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment has the same criminal history as the defendant, and the reason why the case is induced by walking the taxi first is disadvantageous to the defendant: Provided, That the defendant needs time expenses due to the refusal of boarding.

Considering that the crime of this case was caused by some circumstances, the taxi door was not actually damaged, and the circumstances leading up to the boomment are also considered to result from the victim’s immediate reporting to the police and the punishment of the expense.