logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.04.12 2018고단482
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the time of Guri-si, is the site warden at the construction site of multi-family houses and neighboring living facilities located in Guri-si, and the construction completion procedure of the above building has been delayed, and the certificate of completion inspection of fire-fighting facilities has been forged at will to obtain permission

Accordingly, the Defendant obtained, on December 2017, a copy of the former Fire-Fighting Facility Completion Inspection Certificate (Consent to Use) in the name of the head of the fire-fighting station in the name of the head of the former Fire-Fighting Facility in the name of the head of the fire station in the Guri-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Namyang-si, Seoul, without authority, for the purpose of exercising and exercising the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in 104 Do 1402 and 1402 of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant made use of a computer to “specific fire-fighting object subject to completion” column in the “name: G building: G building, the location of the Gu, the site area: 242 square meters in the Gyeonggi-do, the site area: 481.8 square meters in the owner column, and “the date of preparation” column “the date of the fire-fighting facility completion” and made it again in the name of the former fire-fighting facility after arbitrarily making the certificate.

In addition, the Defendant requested the employees of H's design office at the time of Si/Gu-si to vicariously file an application for a completion inspection of the above building, which caused the Defendant to interfere with the completion inspection certificate of the fire-fighting system prepared as above.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged a copy of the completion inspection certificate in the name of the head of the Gu fire station, which is an official document, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. The depth of the relevant Article of a certificate of completion of fire-fighting systems submitted for viewing;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of completion of fire-fighting systems inspection (approval for use);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of Article 25 of the Criminal Act) and Article 299 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;

arrow