1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, the insured vehicle CD on November 17, 2017 at the time of the insured vehicle, insured vehicle CD at the time of the accident, and the vehicle in the situation of collision to the intersection near the F art gallery located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Y, reported the vehicle to the left left on the right side at the intersection, and stopped the vehicle to the left at the right side. While the vehicle was left the left at the right side of the vehicle, the vehicle reported the vehicle to the left on the front side of the driver's seat in the front part of the vehicle in the front part of the vehicle while the vehicle was left the left. The fact that there is no dispute over the insurance money payment of KRW 7,250,00 in the front part of the insurance money, and KRW 200,00 of the self-paid vehicle damage charge for the insured vehicle in security [based on recognition], Gap

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s vehicle found the Defendant’s vehicle to turn to the left and stopped, but the Defendant’s vehicle neglected to perform its duty at the time of front stop and conflicts with the front part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat by negligence that caused a left turn to the left. As such, the Plaintiff’s vehicle did not have any way to avoid collision, and the instant accident occurred by negligence of the Defendant’s driver

Therefore, the defendant is obliged to pay the full amount of the repair cost paid by the plaintiff who acquired the right of compensation by subrogation of the insurer.

B. The Plaintiff’s driver was negligent in failing to perform the duty of safe driving due to collision with the Defendant’s vehicle while bypassing the vehicle at a reasonable place on the right side, and it is reasonable to view that the negligence ratio is 50%.

3. Determination

A. According to the facts based on which the accident in this case was based, and each of the above evidence and arguments, the accident in this case is an accident that conflict with the plaintiff vehicle that the defendant vehicle, who was left at the intersection, was going to the left at the opposite direction, and the driver of the defendant vehicle, who is left to the left, has the duty of care to move to the right and the left well so as not to interfere with the driving of the vehicle in the opposite direction.