1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On February 8, 2010, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the escape of a conical signboard, escape of a conical signboard, escape of a conical signboard, etc., by driving a car between E E on February 18, 2010 and driving the car at a three-distance intersection located in the Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, along the stop signal.

(2) On October 11, 2011, the F succeeded to F’s property by Defendant C and D, the wife of Defendant B and his children.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. 1) In full view of the following circumstances, comprehensively taking into account the statement No. 2 of the judgment on the escape certificate of light-to-face and the judgment on the escape certificate of side-to-faceical signboards, the first instance court’s physical examination of the head of the Daejeon University Hospital, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it can be acknowledged that there is a proximate causal relation with the accident of this case. (A) A) A character-to-face external medical specialist of the Daejeon Institute of Daejeon University may be deemed to have a causal relation with the accident of this case, and H’s judgment on the degree of involvement in the accident presented in H’s “the basis of compensation medical science” (in cases where there is a possibility that there is no proximate causal relation with the accident of this case) shall be determined as a contribution of 50% by applying mutatis mutandis the criteria for judgment on the degree of involvement in the accident presented in H’s “the basis of compensation medical science.”

B) The Plaintiff’s lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition not to grant medical care for official duties (Seoul Administrative Court’s 201Gudan689) filed against the Public Official Pension Service was diagnosed as having caused an injury or disease of “MRI’s escape” and “pendical signboards escape from No. 5-5,” and the instant accident contributed to approximately 50% of the outbreak of the injury or disease.