logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.14 2013가단5043
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On February 8, 2010, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the escape of a conical signboard, escape of a conical signboard, escape of a conical signboard, etc., by driving a car between E E on February 18, 2010 and driving the car at a three-distance intersection located in the Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, along the stop signal.

(2) On October 11, 2011, the F succeeded to F’s property by Defendant C and D, the wife of Defendant B and his children.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of Gap evidence No. 2 and the result of the court’s commission of physical examination to the director of the Daejeon Embry University Daejeon Hospital, it can be acknowledged that there was a proximate causal relation with the instant accident after the accident.

(1) A medical specialist of the Daejeon-type Hospital of the Daejeon-type University who is an appraisal commission agency evaluated as follows: “The Gyeong-type and Gyeong-type signboard escape certificate may be deemed to have a causal relationship with the instant accident; and H’s standard for determining the degree of involvement in the accident presented in the “based compensation medical science” (in a case where the possibility of proximate causal relation with the external accident exists and there is a counter-component possibility that there may be no proximate causal relation with the external accident), it shall be determined as an apportionment ratio of 50%.”

(2) In the medical record appraisal request in the lawsuit to revoke the approval of medical care in the line of duty filed by the Plaintiff against the Public Official Pension Service (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Gudan689), it is believed that the instant accident contributed to approximately 50% of the outbreak of the injury and disease.

In other words, this case's change of the king witness withdrawal.

arrow