Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 16, 2018, in front of the bus stop of 1134 as of the address population of the defendant around 23:10 on May 16, 2018, in front of the bus stop of 1134, the police officers, such as the Gyeonggi-dong Police Station C District District D, etc. belonging to the Gyeonggi-dong Police Station of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, dispatched after receiving a report from the main owner, have the defendant board the back seat of the bus stop and let the defendant get out of the bus stop for the defendant's returning home, and let the defendant get out of the bus stop.
What is it??????
C. I expressed his desire to “See ...”, and expressed his face to a police officer belonging to the same district unit one time in drinking, and assaulted a police officer’s face, such as flabing the flab, flabing the flab, flabing the flab, and flabing the flabing part of the flab by drinking, and the right flabing part of the flab by drinking.
On May 17, 2018, the Defendant continued to arrest and take custody of a flagrant offender at the F Office of the Dong-dong Police Station located in the Dong-dong Police Station located in Gyeonggi-do on May 17, 2018, at the time of Gyeonggi-do, for the charges of interference with the performance of official duties, and, after taking the police officers, such as G, etc., of the police station belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station in Jung-dong-dong Police Station, “I am the opening and the opening of the opening and the opening of the opening, and I am back.” As the police officers discovered this, I am from the police officers belonging to the same police station, I am the back of the H’s private sprink, and am walking with the emergency police officers’ explanation.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties for the protection of police officers' lives and bodies.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of statutes on police statements made to E, D, and H;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)
1. Punishment;