logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.01 2017구합104155
전역처분무효확인의소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2012, the Plaintiff served in the First Class B search team at the Army Team at the Army Team at the First Class B, and served as a unit commander from April 10, 2017 to the First Class C group at the Army Team at the First Class C group.

B. On May 30, 2016, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of reprimand as a breach of duty to obey (other instructions) with respect to the following disciplinary actions against the commander of the first search unit of the company:

징계처분대상자 중사(진) 원고는 수색대대 D분대 부분대장으로 근무한 자로 2016. 4. 12. 오전 11:00 ~ 12:00 JSA대대에서 실시한 체력측정 3km 뜀걸음 종료 후 본인의 결과가 좋지 않자 중사(진) E에게 순번표를 바꿔 줄 수 있냐고 제안을 하였고 임관동기인 중사(진) E가 본인은 차후에 특급을 받을 수 있다며 바꾸어 주었으나, 감독관의 확인 과정에서 순번표를 바꾼 것을 적발이 되었으며 사유를 여러번 물었으나 대답하지 못한 사실임

C. In addition, on March 30, 2017, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition for two months of the reduction of salary due to a violation of the duty to maintain dignity (or violation of the duty to maintain dignity and verbal violence) with respect to the disciplinary actions as set forth below from the commander of the first search unit of the company:

On January 2017, the Plaintiff was working as the Furine commander of the search team. Around 2017, the Plaintiff did not focus on the speech of the team leader at the C, A, D, D, D, and D, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, and S, S, S, and S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, and S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, and S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, A, S, S, S, S, S, and S, S, S, only once a bit of a bit, S, S, S, S, S. on February 2017.

D. The plaintiff was above B.

paragraphs (c) and (c)

(b) paragraph (3);

arrow