1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

From December 24, 2015 to August 31, 2017, the Plaintiff changed the company B of the Water Defense Headquarters to a subordinate association of the Army Mobilization Power Headquarters from April 6, 2018.

In the medical stage, he/she worked as the medical ledger (patum).

After deliberation by the Disciplinary Committee on October 26, 2017, the Defendant, on October 30, 2017, issued a disciplinary measure for one month of suspension from office under Article 56 of the Military Personnel Management Act (hereinafter “instant measure”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that the following suspected facts constituted a violation of good faith, duty to maintain dignity, and duty to comply with statutes.

1. A person subject to a conscientious breach of duty (such as “the Plaintiff” due to abuse of authority) is a commander, who is a commander, has a general authority to direct his/her father and his/her father in general regarding administrative matters and military life. A.

A person subject to disciplinary action is aware of the fact that he/she was dispatched to C on April 12, 2017 that he/she knew of the fact that he/she was dispatched to D without military doctor's prescription (hereinafter referred to as "C disciplinary action in this table), and (i) he/she is intended to conceal or reduce it; and (ii) on May 16, 2017, from among the disease control officials in the relevant medical department of Goyang-si, he/she seeks to ask the head of the headquarters for the disciplinary proceedings on disciplinary action against C disciplinary action and the level of similar disciplinary action." By stating that "I will not ask the head of the headquarters. I will not ask the head of the headquarters." By abusing his/her authority, I will interfere with the exercise of rights as a person in charge of disciplinary investigation into B company E (hereinafter referred to as "the fact of suspicion 1"); and on May 18, 2017, he/she will complete the foregoing disciplinary action from the Ethical officer's office to the Ethical officer's order.

The problem of the stage officer or the stage officer is not the same as that of C to reflect on his or her own, but the problem of whether C is the same as that of his or her own.