1. The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff.

purport.

1. On November 27, 2008, the basic fact-finding network D (EE; hereinafter “the deceased”) showed symptoms (e.g., the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s her son.

(2) At the time of the emergency room, the deceased’s blood pressure was 10/70m Hg, 37.4mp, and 78mpambling. The Defendant hospital conducted blood tests to the deceased on November 30, 2008, and conducted brain CT tests on the following date at 00:30,000, but did not find any psychotropic disease. Accordingly, the Defendant hospital asked the deceased to be treated with the mind of the Defendant hospital on December 14: 15, 2008, but the deceased refused it, and the deceased returned to her country. On December 10, 2008, the deceased’s 10:3 pamba and 6mcambromatic disease was 00,000,000,000 after the above symptoms were 10:3 pamba,00,0000,000,000 per annum, and 1:6m 3:0,000,000.

On January 8, 2009, the deceased was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on January 8, 2009, and thereafter the deceased died on September 27, 2009.