1. The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the revoked part shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) (hereinafter “E”) is a company that sells aviation tickets to the Plaintiff (designated parties, hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and the designated parties D (hereinafter “designated parties”) through the Plaintiff, Inc. (hereinafter “E”), and Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “C”) is an insurer that has concluded an insurance contract regarding Defendant B’s liability for damages arising from air carriage by air.

B. On July 30, 2016, the Plaintiffs, using E, departing from Incheon on July 30, 2016 and via Turkey, concluded an international transport contract with Defendant B by purchasing Defendant B’s airline tickets to Spain airport.

C. On July 30, 2016, at the Incheon Airport Counter., the Plaintiffs received one (B) boarding ticket from Defendant B’s employees in Incheon to Estan, respectively, and one (F) boarding ticket from Estan to Estan. Although F’s aircraft boarding horse monitoring angle is 15 minutes prior to the departure, the above two kinds of boarding tickets are all indicated as “the boarding ticket is terminated by 10 minutes prior to the departure.”

The Plaintiffs were waiting to move to the Madrid Aircraft (hereinafter “instant Madrid”) after having arrived at the Madrid Airport B by using B, but the Plaintiffs could not board the aircraft (name G; hereinafter “instant aircraft”) from Madrid due to the completion of boarding.

E. Defendant B and F selected the connecting flight method rather than the joint flight method, but Defendant B performed the issue of F’s boarding passes upon entrustment in accordance with the “Convention between Aviation Projects”.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s eligible party.