beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 1 year and six months and fine of 1,00,000 won, Defendant B of 1 year and fine of 1,000,000 won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, from July 2012 to October 2013, 2013, with the trade name of “E,” installed 4-5 beds, rash machinery, etc., and operated the skin management office. Defendant B, as a partner of Defendant A, performed accounting management and operation of the skin management office while serving as a manager in the above skin management office.
1. No person, other than a medical person, is allowed to conduct medical practice.
Nevertheless, around April 2013, Defendant B recommended the victim F to undergo the rashing procedure with the victim’s words “I have been satisfe due to any satch that occurred after being undergone the Stockholm removal operation for about two years prior to the lapse of the year,” and the victim’s words “I have been operating the satisfe in the south of Gangnam, and, upon receiving the rash operation from A, the satfe would be cleanly destroyed.”
Defendant
A around April 25, 2013, in the above “E” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government GB113, around April 25, 2013, the victim visited the above chest problem as seen above, is cleanly clean if he is about 10 times to receive the rash operation, settling the amount of KRW 3 million and causing 10 times to undergo the rash operation,” and the Defendant B paid KRW 300,000 to the victim in cash.
Defendant
B The victim's anesthesia is found on the part of the victim's unclaimed body, and the defendant A placed the victim on the bed, put the victim on the bed, put the victim on the part of the victim, put the victim on the part of the 5-10-minutes on the part of the victim's unclaimed body, put the rash treatment on the part of the 5-10-minutes using the one-person CO2 rash machinery, put the rash treatment on the part of the 5-10-minutes, and the defendant B should shot the cosmetics with the rash treatment and purchase the cosmetics after the rash treatment at the expense of the cosmetic.
As a result, the Defendants were engaged in medical practice for profit-making purposes even though they were not in collusion.
2. No person, other than a medical person, shall engage in medical practice;
Nevertheless, the Defendants on May 2013.