logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.05.28 2019고단4242
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and for a defendant B, for eight months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The employee loan system guaranteed by the Korea Housing Finance Corporation is divided into “National Housing Fund loan” operated by six banks in the city and “financial resources loan operated by 17 banks in the city,” and the said Corporation guarantees 90% of the loans without securing them.

C. D’s abuse of the employee full-time loan system is a person who falsely prepares documents, such as a false certificate of employment, marriage relation certificate, etc. necessary for loans and distributes loans to a nominal person by allowing the nominal person to file an application for loans. E is a person who falsely performs a lessor, Defendant A served as an applicant for a loan by a false lessee, and Defendant B served as a false spouse of the applicant for a loan.

The above C, D, E, and the Defendants: (a) using the fact that in the case of a worker’s pre-paid loan, the procedures for the examination of loan and the collection of loan are not strict compared to other loans; (b) using the false marriage certificate, employment certificate, and the pre-paid contract as if the worker who reported the marriage was actually entering into the pre-paid contract; and (c) drafted a false marriage certificate, employment certificate, and the pre-paid contract,

1. On April 3, 2013, the Defendants entered false records, such as public electromagnetic records, etc., and submitted a marriage report to the public official in charge of false names by the Jung-gu public service center of Daejeon Daejeon Metropolitan City, which is located in the center of Daejeon, on April 3, 2013, as seen above, as if they had no intention to marry and had no intention to marry.

As a result, the public official who is in charge of knowing the fact has entered the information processing system into the electronic data processing system into the marriage relationship of the defendants.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to the public official, and make it the same as the original notarial deed.

arrow