logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고단893
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of eight months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic, at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 27, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2015.

[2] Defendant B is a person who actually runs a sexual traffic business establishment from around 2014 to October 24, 2015 with the trade name of G from around 2014 to around 2015. Defendant B is a person who actually runs the said business establishment with Defendant B from around July 1, 2015 to around 24, 2015, by entering into a lease contract for the said G building in his/her name.

On July 17, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 100,000 from H, a customer, in the above G, and let I, an employee of the above G, knife the H’s sexual organ with his hand and put it into a shaking, etc. in the six room of the above business. On October 24, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 80,000 from the J, an employee of the above business, who was receiving KRW 80,00 for sexual traffic from the said G, and had the employee of the above business knife the knife with the knife in the sexual flag of J, and let the employee of the business knife the knife.

Accordingly, Defendant B alone or in collusion with the Defendants in light of the overall facts charged, the records of the applicable legal provisions, and evidence records, appears to have been omitted “Defendant B” in this part of the criminal facts, and it does not seem to substantially obstruct the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense even if it was added without any changes in the indictment, thereby adding them ex officio as above.

Defendant

B From around July 1, 2015 to October 24, 2015, Defendant A engaged in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, from around July 1, 2015 to October 24, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' respective legal statements (the defendant A is on the second trial date)

1. Each prosecutorial protocol against the Defendants (the value added to the Defendants A) concerning the interrogation of the Defendants.

arrow