logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단2498
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2017, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for the business of raising the profits of KRW 15,000 by receiving KRW 30,000 from E, a male grandchild who found his place from Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, and allowing F, an employee of sexual traffic, to engage in sexual intercourse with the above E and providing the said F with KRW 15,00, and raising the profits of KRW 15,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report the occurrence of the case, report internal investigation and site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, motive and means of crime, results, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing as stated in the argument of this case, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and again committed the crime of this case, which is favorable to the poor quality of the crime: The confession is contradictory to the confession, there is no record of criminal punishment other than the one-time fine due to the same crime, and the defendant seems not to have operated his business on a regular basis, such as directly employing sexual traffic women. The profits from the crime of this case are insignificant, and the non-offending

arrow