1.(a)

In Jeju-si, among the 1329 square meters of forest land, it connects each point of the attached Form 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 11 among the 1329 square meters of forest land.

1. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence No. 1-2 and 2 as to the claim for partition of co-owned property, the plaintiff owns 331/1329 square meters of C forest land in Jeju-si, and the defendant owns 98/1329 shares, and the defendant owns 2751 square meters of D religious land in Jeju-si, and the plaintiff owns 66/2751 shares, the defendant owns 2685/2751 shares, and the defendant did not reach an agreement on the method of partition of co-owned property between the plaintiff and the defendant by the date of closing argument. Thus, the plaintiff may file a claim against the defendant for partition of the land No. 1 and 2 in this case.

Meanwhile, according to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the plaintiff and the defendant, on December 26, 2005, and on the other hand, on the land Nos. 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, and 11 among the land No. 1 of this case, the part (d) in the ship connected each point in order of 331 square meters and the land No. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 18 among the land No. 2 of this case, the part (b) connected each point of the above No. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 13 are divided into the above land No. 1 of this case, and each of the above parts (hereinafter referred to as "the land No. 2 of this case") is not divided into the land No. 1 of this case, and the land No. 2 of this case is deemed to have been divided into 981,214,25.