(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1404

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1404

공무집행방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the basic identity of the facts charged is recognized, and the defendants' right of defense is not unfairly undermined, the facts charged are partly modified and specified in accordance with the facts acknowledged by the evidence.

1. On June 1, 2017, Defendant A: (a) at the main point located in the F in Seocheon-si, 03:00 on June 1, 2017, the Defendant: (b) received a report on the disturbance caused by Defendant’s daily activity and the other customers’ daily activity; and (c) at the seat of the police officer, the Defendant did not stop even though the police officer called out, despite being called to the police officer, the Defendant’s arms going to the other party of the Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Police Station G District; (d) did not stop; (e) when the police officer called the Defendant, the Defendant’s arms and sold to the other party of the Sincheon-do; and (e) took the Defendant’s body, the Defendant’s body with his arms and body, faced with the instant police officer’s left kne and knee.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

[Examination of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court reveals that the above police officer who had been performing official duties was assaulted as above.

The defendant and defense counsel's assertion that the defendant did not use force against the police officer, or that even if part of the defendant exercised force, it was extremely minor to view it as violence does not have merit.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, was found to have been unable to arrest the police officer as a current criminal, and the police officer’s failure to arrest the Defendant A, who committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties as described in paragraph 1, as the Defendant’s daily conduct, to the extent that the police officer attempted to arrest the Defendant as a current criminal.

The sound shall be sound with the words ", etc.", and the shoulder part of the horse H shall be his hand.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2016.05.11 2016고단43

-서울북부지방법원 2018.03.13 2018고단13

-수원지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고단4875

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.01.12 2017고단704

-서울동부지방법원 2021.02.01 2020고단2085