Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2014, the Defendant, along with B, operated an implied factory at a factory located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and after three months thereafter, the Defendant alone operated the above factory. From around August 2014, the Defendant filed a complaint with B, who operated the above factory on his own, and who was economically difficult and economically difficult, brought himself to the above implied factory business, to receive the agreed amount.
On November 1, 2015, the Defendant received false consultation from the attorney-at-law office located in 1002, Busan B, and then printed out false written complaints from the said attorney-at-law via e-mail, and submitted them to police officers whose name is not known at the Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, the 1-305 public service center of the Busan, which is located in 305, on November 26, 2015. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant made a supplementary statement at the investigation of the Busan, Seo-gu police station and the economic team office.
The complaint filed by the defendant B around May 2014, "I wish to provide an implied distribution service while operating the factory after leasing an implied factory" to the defendant B around May 2014.
The factory lease deposit was paid by the government.
“A real estate lease agreement, which was entered into in the Defendant’s small-scale writing to register a business operator, was issued, and the purport is that the Defendant’s small-scale document was written without the consent of the lessee of the factory, and thus punished for the crime of forging private documents, etc. is different.” In the written statement to supplement the complaint, “No. 1 changed the real estate lease agreement to the Defendant’s small-scale document because it was possible for the Defendant to engage in the business to register the business.”
The defendant showed the contract, but he knew that this contract was prepared by the defendant.
After the last confirmation, F, the owner of the factory, has leased the factory in full due to the lack of the establishment of a rental contract with the defendant.
First, it seems that it is necessary to conduct business when making a false statement.