Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2011, B, an agricultural company run by the Defendant, entered into a sales contract to purchase KRW 32,500,000,00 of the pre-Yandong-gun D (hereinafter “instant land”) from C to purchase KRW 2,146,00,000, and paid the purchase price.

When the Defendant, along with E, constructed at least 10 F Village while promoting a “F Village Project” in the instant land zone, he/she was aware that subsidies, etc. were granted from the Young-gun, and received a building permit by borrowing from G one of F Village under his/her name.

Since then, the Defendant demanded G to the effect that “the construction permit has been in the name of the party, so that it would not take the purchase price of the instant land or cancel the construction permit.” However, G was willing to submit a false complaint for the purpose of cancelling the said construction permit, which would not seem to have any response.

On March 19, 2014, the Defendant entered into a sales contract to purchase KRW 508 square meters of the instant land from the Defendant around July 18, 201, at the public service center of the public service center of the Gwangju District Office located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, a compliance officer, and requested the Defendant to prepare a written consent for land use in the first place, which would reduce the price of the instant land if the building permit is granted. The Defendant, despite having received a written consent for land use from the owner of the instant land from C on the registration of the said land, acquired KRW 30,70,000,000, which is the amount equivalent to the purchase price, from the Defendant, without paying the purchase price, even if he/she acquired the written consent for land use from the owner of the instant land.

【A false complaint was submitted.”

However, in fact, G did not have concluded a sales contract with the Defendant on the instant land, and did not request the Defendant to receive a written consent for land use, and it was merely limited to lending the building permit to the Defendant who was promoting the F Village project from the Young-gun in order to receive the F Village subsidy.