1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,900,000 as well as annual 5% from July 19, 2014 to May 19, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff came to death with the Defendant from around 2008.

B. On August 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on an officetel to be used as a work room in the name of the Defendant on behalf of the Plaintiff on August 21, 2009 (hereinafter “instant work room”). The Plaintiff paid KRW 5 million in the name of the deposit for the lease of the said work room to the lessor around that time.

C. The details that the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant through its new bank account and national bank account from August 21, 2009 to June 3, 2010, and the details that the Defendant remitted to the Plaintiff from December 15, 2009 to August 13, 2013 are as follows.

6,00,000 won on October 1, 200 1, 200. 1, 200. 30,000 won on October 5, 2009, 200 won on October 14, 2009, 6,00,000 won on October 6, 200, 60,000 won on December 10, 209, 200. 30,00 won on December 15, 200, 20. 10, 30. 10,00 won on December 15, 200, 20. 10. 1, 50,00 won on March 1, 200, 200; 1,50,00 won on March 1, 20, 200; 1,000 won on May 30, 2010

D. While the Plaintiff transferred the above money to the Defendant, the Defendant did so at the instant workroom where the Plaintiff resided, and even used the telecom with the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff did not bear the expenses of the telecom at the time.

In addition, the opportunity for the Plaintiff to remit money to the Defendant as above should be determined by the Defendant, who had a relationship with the Plaintiff, as seen above, that “it was under the planning to operate the business on the side of Thailand, but it was not softened. The business is known.” or the beauty art room money should be paid to the Plaintiff when it was used as a business by raising the lost money.