beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant is between the plaintiff and the defendant since 2006 and about 4 years to 5 years.
B. On May 31, 2007, the Defendant prepared and delivered the loan certificate to the Plaintiff, stating the loan certificate of KRW 18,000,000 and the interest rate of KRW 1% per month (hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”).
C. The details of account transfers between the Plaintiff and the Defendant from April 6, 2006 to May 25, 2009 are as follows.
순번 거래일 원고 송금액 피고 송금액 1 2006. 4. 6. 2,300,000원 2 2006. 5. 24. 1,000,000원 3 2006. 10. 13. 67,000원 4 2007. 1. 2. 400,000원 5 2007. 1. 5. 490,000원 6 2007. 1. 16. 300,000원 7 2007. 1. 17. 300,000원 8 2007. 1. 30. 500,000원 9 2007. 2. 8. 100,000원 10 2007. 4. 5. 2,000,000원 11 2007. 4. 20. 2,000,000원 12 2007. 4. 20. 22,200원 13 2007. 4. 23. 700,000원 14 2007. 5. 3. 300,000원 15 2007. 5. 7. 1,400,000원 16 2007. 5. 14. 500,000원 17 2007. 5. 31. 4,994,247원 18 2007. 5. 31. 2,999,686원 19 2007. 5. 31. 1,010,000원 20 2007. 5. 31. 2,100,984원 21 2007. 5. 31. 10원 22 2007. 5. 31. 1,015,073원 23 2007. 6. 21. 150,000원 24 2007. 9. 17. 100,000원 25 2007. 11. 27. 800,000원 26 2007. 12. 31. 1,000,000원 27 2007. 12. 31. 500,000원 28 2008. 1. 10. 5,000원 29 2008. 9. 1. 400,000원 30 2008. 11. 27. 700,000원 31 2008. 12. 26. 700,000원 32 2009. 2. 2. 550,000원 33 2009. 2. 20. 500,000원 34 2009. 3. 5. 500,000원 35 2009. 5. 25. 500,000원 합계 23,142,000원 7,762,200원
D. Although the Defendant’s criminal complaint against the Plaintiff was filed by the Defendant, the fact that the Plaintiff had a relation with the Plaintiff was in an economically difficult situation, the Defendant brought the instant lawsuit based on the instant loan certificate, and subsequently sought a favorable judgment in the first instance court, and claimed that the Plaintiff took property benefits by collecting KRW 6,798,986 through the seizure of the deposit claims in the bank account in the name of the Defendant, and filed a complaint against the Plaintiff as fraud.
In the above criminal case, the original defendant's account.