logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 02. 14. 선고 2012두24122 판결
(심리불속행) 보험대리점이 가공인건비로 계상한 일용인건비는 필요경비 산입대상이 아님[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu17201 (Law No. 26, 2012.09)

Title

(Trial poorness) The daily labor cost appropriated by an insurance agency as the processing labor cost shall not be included in the necessary expenses.

Summary

(Summary of the original instance) Although it is argued that the daily labor cost calculated in the book was paid in cash, it cannot be recognized that there is no specific financial data, such as cash withdrawal, or any specific financial data and earned income, or there is no original market for detailed labor details and wage payment.

Cases

2012du24122 Global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

LAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Central Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu17201 Decided September 26, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal are examined, but it is clear that the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow