logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고정426
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a vehicle owned by a medical corporation for commuting to and from the workplace;

On February 2, 2020, the Defendant: (a) at the B Hospital parking lot located in Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun on February 2, 2020; (b) on the ground that, without the consent of the Defendant, the Secretary General of Pyeongtaek-gun without the consent of the Defendant, on the ground that he unilaterally inspects CCTV installed inside the above commuting vehicle and black stuffs, and watchs themselves, thereby spreading approximately 3 cm away from the parking lot surface; and (c) he was aware of this fact by having DW driver under the said victim drive the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle, thereby causing damage to the repair cost market.

2. Around February 21, 2020, the Defendant attempted to destroy or damage property, at the place indicated in the above paragraph (1) at around 21:21, the Defendant attempted to spread approximately 3 ccarious brupted vehicles from the same reason as indicated in the above paragraph (1) and by flooding the same method, but the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime by discovering and removing the BMW vehicles owned by the victim’s employees E.

3. On February 18, 2020, the Defendant attempted to destroy or damage property, at the place indicated in the above paragraph (1) at around 21:42 on February 18, 2020, by spreading around approximately 3 cms by the same reasons as the mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1) and by water methods, but the Defendant attempted to destroy or damage the BMW vehicle owned by the victim, but the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime by discovering and removing the same by the employees E belonging to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photographic report submitted by the petitioner (CCTV image analysis and suspect search);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 371 and 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow