A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 01:00 on April 16, 2016, from the CCTV Control Center in front of the entrance of the subway C, which was located in the city interesting city B, around 01:0, in front of the exit of the city interesting CCTV control center in the city interesting city, the Defendant “

“The Defendant requested the Defendant to present his identification card on the part of the patrol vehicle on which the police officer was on board, without any justifiable reason, when the police officer D or D, who was on the part of the Gyeonggi Police Station C District of the Gyeonggi Police Station, searched the surrounding area of the police station C District, and the police officer D or E, who was on the part of the police officer on board, demanded the Defendant to present his identification card;

C. The embling, Japan, or the strongest solution was expressed, “D” was tightly tightly frighted, tightly frightened, tightly frightened, tightly frightened the shoulder of the above E, and frighten the arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence are as follows: (a) within the scope of the sentencing standard [basic sphere: June - January 1] on the basis of the following circumstances: (b) the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime; (c) the Defendant was punished once by a fine for the same crime around 2009; and (d) the Defendant’s age, occupation, family relation, etc.