beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. In relation to the land No. 1 listed in the attached list to Plaintiff A and B, the Jung-gu District Court is the annual registry office.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. During the strong point of view of each of the lands in this case, Plaintiff A’s Madern Net E and Plaintiff B’s Madern Net F indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”). Plaintiff C’s Madern G was identified as the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) and the land indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 2 and 3 in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant Nos. 2 and 3”), Plaintiff B’s Madern G, and Plaintiff C’s Madern G, as the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land Nos. 4 and 5”); Plaintiff D’s Madern G was identified as the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) and Plaintiff D’s 6 (hereinafter “instant land”).
[The owner of the forest land Nos. 4 and 5 of this case is written as "state", and F and G are written as "relatives", and F and G are recorded as "relatives", and it is in secret column. Although the defendant asserts that F and G were not considered to have received the above land circumstances, it is reasonable to deem that F and G were under the circumstances of F and G were entered as the owner, the south of F, in the separate survey report on the use of public forest prepared on July 1941, and entered as F and G, in the old forest register restored to F and G, and entered as the owner of F and G, in the above land in the old forest register restored to F and G, together with the fact that F and G cemeterys are installed.
B. The plaintiff's inheritance (1) died and the son-Nam succeeded to Australia, the J also died, and the J died on June 7, 1950.
Plaintiff
A is the fourth male co-inheritors of K, one of whom is E's four co-inheritors.
(2) On August 7, 1937, the above F died and succeeded to Australia by the Republic of Korea I, and I died on June 24, 1983.
Plaintiff
B as the head of I, one of F co-inheritors.
(3) The above G died on November 7, 1949 and succeeded to Australia, and died on March 1, 1995.
Plaintiff
C is one of the co-inheritorss of M as L's south.
(4) On January 26, 1920, the above H died and succeeded to Australia N, N on April 22, 1990.
Plaintiff
D is one of the five co-inheritors of the network N, among H's co-inheritors.
C. The defendant.