1. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) shall have the real estate listed in the annexed sheet No. 1 as indicated in the annexed sheet No. 2 of the inheritance shares.

1. The facts below the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 9 (including the branch numbers, if any).

On September 30, 1918, Plaintiff (Appointed 30, July 30, 1918, hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and Appointed B acquired ownership from C as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and registered as the owner on the old land cadastre.

B. On March 5, 1931, the above net B was registered in the name named D and named on its old land cadastre.

C. Inheritance Relations (1) On November 22, 1954, the deceased deceased D, and the family head heir, the family head E was a sole inheritance.

(2) On March 24, 1969, the deceased E was deceased, and the deceased spouse F and the plaintiffs became co-inheritors.

(3) On February 25, 2009, the above netF died and the plaintiffs jointly inherited. D.

(1) The family register relation (1) is registered as the birth of Australia H in the name of the family registry (D after the name of the family registry) in the name of the family registry (D after the name of the family registry) and the correction is recorded as D, which is the name of the family registry.

(2) Since then, the network D was divided into Australia and registered as Australia in the name of “Seoul-si, Jinnam-do,” the permanent domicile of which is “Seoul-do.”

2. According to the above facts of recognition, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 was owned by D and D listed as the owner on the old land cadastre, the same person as the plaintiff's assistance, and succeeded to the plaintiff and the designated parties, and they own the same as the share in the separate sheet No. 2 inheritance shares.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted for the benefit of confirmation, and it is so decided as per Disposition.