logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.22 2015나18206
보험금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 29, 2009, at around 06:30, the car log distance in front of the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, while the plaintiff A drives the C c c c c c st-do car (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff's car") carrying the plaintiff B, driving it in the direction of the Gyeyang-gu Police Station in the direction of the Gyeyang-gu.

They turn to the left in the direction of the operations station, and E was driving the FST5 car (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant car") with H and I on board, and was proceeding in the direction of the Gyeyang Police Station.

At the center of the intersection, there was an accident in which Won and defendant car conflict with each other (hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

B. On April 27, 2011, the Plaintiffs, E, and I suffered injury, and H had died. The Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc. on April 27, 2011, and it was finalized on January 12, 2012.

The facts charged in the above case are as follows.

Plaintiff

A is a person engaged in driving of the Plaintiff’s car owned by the Plaintiff B.

Plaintiff

A On November 29, 2009, around 06:30 on November 29, 2009, he/she seems to be a clerical error in the "Incheon Gyeyang-gu D" in the Incheon Gyeyang-guJ.

The fourth line of the road in front of the car death distance was proceeding in accordance with the direction of the Gyeyang Police Station in the vicinity of the tent.

At the time, the plaintiff A had a duty of care to safely drive by complying with the signal signal signal, etc., since the plaintiff A would drive a private street crossing with the signal signal.

Nevertheless, the plaintiff A neglected this and neglected to turn to the left from the operation station even though the front-way signal was a straight line, and the part of the victim E(the age of 47) driving, the front-way part of the driver's vehicle driving of the victim E(the age of 47), who was proceeding the above intersection from the front-way police station to the front-way part of the driver's vehicle.

arrow