logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.13 2016가단5092006
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Defendant is an insurer of a sports facility business entity’s liability insurance contract, which compensates the loss incurred by the insured in the event of an accident that occurred in the two sides of the wife population at the time of the permit for the so-called "skich of this case" operated by the Pakistan from July 10, 2013 to July 10, 2014, with the period of insurance as the insured for the so-called "skich of this case" (hereinafter referred to as "skich of this case") with the so-called "skich of this case"), to compensate for the loss caused by the insured’s legal liability to a third party.

On March 1, 2014, at around 19:50, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as Madle fever, the left slicker, the left slves of the instant skiing ground, since he was getting a skiing from the slves Slves, which was a higher course in the instant skiing ground.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff, immediately after having suffered the accident, went home to the hospital on March 3, 2014, and was under operation on March 25, 2014.

[Grounds for recognition] No. 1-2, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1-2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1-1, and the plaintiff's assertion as to the ground for claim as to the whole purport of the pleadings as to the plaintiff's ground for claim. At the time of the accident of this case, while the snow of approximately 1/3 of the location where the skiing was lowered out of 340 meters in total length, the plaintiff got out of slves, the plaintiff was caused by the accident.

On the day of the accident, Ski is very hot as the day immediately before the Ski is closed, and many snows were melted in a melter lush state, but the Skis did not supplement snow, and the Skis did not provide guidance to prohibit Skis or place safety personnel.

Therefore, Pakistan is an accident in this case according to the legal principles of responsibility for nonperformance, responsibility for tort, and responsibility for structures.

arrow