logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.11.19 2015고단788
뇌물수수
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and a fine of 30 million won.

If the above fine is not paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From November 3, 2012 to November 3, 2012, the head of the old LAA (hereinafter referred to as the “instant association”); Defendant C and D were each directors of the said association for the same period; Defendant B was working for the representative director of M (State) from around 2003 to the present date; and N was an agent for the implementation of the old LA urban development project.

"2015 Highest 788"

1. Defendant B

A. The Defendant offered a bribe of KRW 10 million to the head of the instant association, who did not receive N’s assertion from the instant association, requested the head of the A association to pay KRW 4.3 billion as soon as possible, but the head of the A association failed to pay the amount of KRW 2 billion, such as that the head of the A association would pay only KRW 2 billion, and was willing to receive cooperation by offering a bribe.

On July 8, 2014, the Defendant said that “The head of the cooperative would be able to promptly receive the cryption” from the office of the cooperative in the Gu and America, Q.S., and 10 million won in cash was dry.”

Accordingly, the defendant given a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.

B. On July 30, 2014, the Defendant acquired third-party brains worth 20 million won in cash through T department upon receipt of a request from the former director S of the L Housing Development Model EM in the Gu-U.S. L Housing Development Project (U.S.) to “as he requested the head of the A.S. association to cooperate with the project, such as the alteration of ecological area, and to deliver cash of KRW 20 million.”

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables with the knowledge that it was intended to give a bribe in connection with the duties of public officials.

2. Defendant A

A. On July 8, 2014, the Defendant received a request for acceptance of bribe KRW 10 million in cash from the representative director B, a project implementation agent, at QA’s office located in the old Si QA on behalf of the Gu, to the effect that “it would be possible to promptly receive the money.”

Accordingly, the defendant is about the duties of public officials.

arrow