logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.15 2017나2052864
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it

However, among the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff, the following judgments are added to the grounds for appeal newly asserted in the trial.

Defendant C shall be deemed to have violated 1, 4, 5 under the 2nd Amendment by way of “Defendant C” 1, 10, 14 through 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 15, 18, 6-2, 10, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 10, 11, 12, 15, 11, 7, 11, 8-3, 4, 10, 10, 10, 18-1, 16, 14, 17-1, 8, 10, 9, 18-1, 19, 10, 14, 14, 104, 16, 14, 17, 14, 17

2. Judgment on the ground for appeal by the plaintiff

A. The Plaintiff’s grounds for appeal did not report the license agreement under the name of “distribution agency” by the Plaintiff Company I (hereinafter “I”).

arrow