The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable by the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the court below committed the same kind of crime several times during the repeated crime, even though the defendant had been sentenced to punishment for the same crime, and repeated crimes several times during the repeated crime period. The crime of this case was committed by repeating the crime of cutting off goods in planned public places such as university library or the public place where surveillance was neglected, and the nature of the crime and the method of the crime was poor, the agreement or the recovery of damage was not made up to the trial, and the punishment of the court below was not made by taking into account all favorable circumstances, such as the confession of the crime and the reflection against the defendant, and there was no change of circumstances at the trial, and taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the background and means of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's career and character, etc., the punishment of the court below cannot be deemed unfair

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.