The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, based on a forged lease agreement, takes part in the so-called work loan fraud that takes place as a real estate owner by taking part in the so-called work loan fraud that takes out a loan from a financial institution, and takes part in it as a real estate owner. The punishment of the court below is unreasonable by taking account of all favorable circumstances such as the following: (a) the method and quality of the crime are inferior and high possibility of social criticism; (b) the amount of damage was exceeded 600 million won in total; (c) the agreement or recovery from damage was not reached up to the trial; (d) the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime; (e) the fact that there is no particular criminal power; and (e) the fact that there is no change of circumstances at the trial; and (e) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the background and means of the crime of this case, degree of damage, circumstances after

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.