A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 21, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance by force, by taking advantage of the following: (a) at Dcafeteria located in the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo apartment underground shopping mall; (b) at the victim E (n.e., 59 years of age) under the influence of alcohol, “Woo hack hackk, the same hack hack hack hack,” and throw away the table hack.

B. On June 10, 2014, around 06:30 on June 10, 2014, the Defendant, at the convenience store located in Mapo-gu Seoul, expressed a large amount of voice for about 2 to 3 minutes, such as “this fex, frush, and frush” to the victim I working at the convenience store on the grounds that H, the head of the convenience store, does not have reached an agreement on the assault case, and “this frush,” and “this frush and this fruz,” which read “frub, etc., where the main place is, frush, so that customers are unable to enter the convenience store by spreading about 10 minutes of plastic tables, chairs, and frush, etc. at the convenience store in front of the convenience store.” At around 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) frushed the victim’s convenience store, thereby obstructing the victim’s work.

C. On September 21, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the effect that the Defendant would not use other customers as to the Plaintiff’s convenience stores operated by the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Court (hereinafter “Ch, 43 years of age); (b) expressed to the effect that the Defendant would not use other customers as to the Defendant’s use of the table table, and move to another table table; and (c) took the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as going through a large voice, “after being paid to theme during which it would be Chewing, Chewing, and Chewing,” and interfere with the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as going outside the bridge to prevent other customers from sitting on the table.

At around 20:00 on October 13, 2014, the Defendant demanded that the victim N (the 49-year-old age) who is the main owner of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Da apartment shopping mall 109 pay alcohol and satisfaction on credit.